[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?
From: |
Ted Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:57:20 -0400 |
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 14:25 -0400, Adrian Thurston wrote:
> When the user takes some action,
> the PHP frontend submits the message to the daemon, which encrypts it
> and distributes it to the user's network of friends.
We cannot trust encryption of any kind on a hosting-provided server. It
is impossible to do encryption safely if you assume you do not control
the CPU.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, (continued)
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Adrian Thurston, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Henry Litwhiler, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Sean Corbett, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Henry Litwhiler, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Jason Self, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Ted Smith, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Jason Self, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Ted Smith, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Carlo von Loesch, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Adrian Thurston, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?,
Ted Smith <=
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Matt Lee, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Adrian Thurston, 2010/03/28