Re: [STUMP] [UPDATE]Re: Tag-based window management

[Michael Raskin]

Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
>>> I guess, your X sends events which stumpwm doesn't understand. I have
>>> relatively the same situation with virt-manager window.
>> I doubt it. If that was the case, I would expect the effect to be
>> persistent - as in Thunderbird temporary windows always get stuck. That
>> is not the case, however. That looks more like "any temporary window has
>> a fixed small probability of not disappearing".

> I had disappearing windows not in persistence fashion.

Probably it is some complicated situation where my hooks fail