|
From: | Bill Northcott |
Subject: | Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure |
Date: | Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:28:43 +1000 |
On 07/07/2008, at 10:03 AM, Scott Christley wrote:
Even if do get subdirectories under the framework, applications still need to specify the framework name at the start. The only way I know to get around this would be hack the include header paths to not require the framework name, but then that would need to be done by every Swarm application on OSX, which is no good.#import <Swarm/defobj/DefObject.h>and yes, I'm talking about the Apple build machinery, building Swarm applications with Apple development tools, Apple runtime, Apple compiler, etc.
I would be very unhappy about this. I think one needs some extraordinarily compelling reason to make a change that would break almost every file of existing Swarm library and model source code.
I would have thought that Swarm sources should be portable across systems with only minor mods. If someone want to build a Cocoa/Appkit GUI or embed a Swarm model in some larger Cocoa edifice. That is cool, but it still does not require the model (system portable) bit to be built using Apple build machinery.
Bill
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |