[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure
From: |
Scott Christley |
Subject: |
Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:25:23 -0700 |
On Jul 8, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Bill Northcott wrote:
That should just work in Xcode. In Cocoa code, you would use
#import <Swarm/defobj.h> This looks in Swarm.framework/Headers
where it finds defobj.h via the symlinks.
Within Swarm and Swarm model code we have #include <defobj/defobj.h>
which is found through the '-I /Library/Swarm.framework/Versions/
Current/include' option setup by configure.
Right, which is exactly the problem I'm talking about... #import
<Swarm/defobj.h> is not the same as #include <defobj/defobj.h>, so we
have two different ways to include in headers, making Swarm apps not
source code identical across the two systems. My suggestion was to
standardize on #import <Swarm/defobj.h>
Currently I don't think these are needed on Mac, I let the system
libraries handle the different architectures.
It would be very pleasing if that were right. I can see that model
code does not need to use arch dependent headers, but I not quite
convinced about the Swarm library build.
Well let me rephrase, for the Cocoa/Apple runtime work, I don't think
these are needed. For using GNU runtime with tcl/tk/blt on Mac
hardware, yes different architectures that need to be handled. Are
you currently building a universal binary?
Any thoughts about the symlinks under /usr/local. Several packages
including Tcl/Tk use them on MacOS.
I'm not familiar with what the issue is here, are you talking about
Swarm binaries that go into /usr/local, or binaries from other tools
that Swarm needs to use?
Scott
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, (continued)
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Scott Christley, 2008/07/06
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Marcus G. Daniels, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Scott Christley, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Scott Christley, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Marcus G. Daniels, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/07
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Scott Christley, 2008/07/08
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/08
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure,
Scott Christley <=
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/08
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Scott Christley, 2008/07/09
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/10
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Scott Christley, 2008/07/10
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/10
- Re: [swarm-hackers] header directory structure, Bill Northcott, 2008/07/08