[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ObjC dynamic parser
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: ObjC dynamic parser |
Date: |
06 Feb 1998 20:04:21 -0800 |
>>>>> "GR" == glen e p ropella <address@hidden> writes:
GR> So, the point is not to *allow* a rich language substrate, but to
GR> allow any language substrate, beit rich or poor, well-defined
GR> (Koza's closure) or ill-defined (exception handling).
Restated, my point is that if Swarm is going to provide a language
substrate, it definitely should be a rich one (Java and Lisp being
examples of rich language substrates). Otherwise, Swarm cannot
really be thought of as a standalone simulation, modelling or development
environment. If Swarm does not provide good language integration
features (but tries) the poor ones it provides will just be in the way.
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, glen e. p. ropella, 1998/02/06
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser,
Marcus G. Daniels <=
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, glen e. p. ropella, 1998/02/06
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/02/07
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, glen e. p. ropella, 1998/02/07
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/02/07
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, Scott Christley, 1998/02/07
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, John Eikenberry [MSAI], 1998/02/07
- moose, Theodore C. Belding, 1998/02/08
- Need SWARM Designer, Ed Swanstrom, 1998/02/18
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, Nelson Minar, 1998/02/09
- Re: ObjC dynamic parser, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/02/09