Re: [Swarm-Modelling] lifecycle requirements

[Marcus G. Daniels]

glen e. p. ropella wrote:
> > Analogies might be
> > made to sand piles or whirlpools where the object is identifiable even
> > though its constituents are in flux.  
Consider a chemical reaction, or the experience of a scent or flavor, 
where what is important is that multiple objects are present at once.  
Then the notion of a container is not actually present and potentially 
misleading even as an implementation detail.