Re: [Swarm-Modelling] lifecycle requirements

[Maarten Sierhuis]

Can you give a requirement definition of what "object evolution" should be like? Maybe this is my lack of understanding and it's clear to everyone else what this definition is.

Thanks ...

Doei ... MXS

_______________________________________________________________________

 Dr. ing. Maarten Sierhuis                 USRA/RIACS

 Senior Scientist                               Mail Stop B269-1

 Human-Centered Computing            NASA Ames Research Center

                                                      Moffett Field, CA 94035

 e-mail: address@hidden              

 Phone: (650) 604-4917                                                                                                                       

 Fax: (650) 604-4036

 http://homepage.mac.com/msierhuis

 http://www.agentisolutions.com

 http://ic.arc.nasa.gov/projects/brahms/index.html

 http://www.riacs.edu

_______________________________________________________________________

This communication is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is prohibited.  If you received this communication in error, please destroy it, all copies and any attachments and notify the sender as soon as possible. Any comments, statements or opinions expressed in this communication do not necessarily reflect those of NASA or USRA/RIACS, its subsidiaries and affiliates.

On Nov 26, 2006, at 11:06 AM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:

The ABM tools out there already

satisfy the object evolution requirement to _some_ extent.  But, we

don't know to _what_ extent.  That's why it would be nice to see some

people chime in about how well various tools meet the requirement (if,

indeed, others think its a requirement).