[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?
From: |
PerfectDark |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 May 2006 10:36:23 +0400 (MSD) |
There is also OpenC++ at sourceforge.net... Of course, I think, gcc G++
frontend also can be used - in case that generated RTL will be transformed into
C code.
>On Mon, 22 May 2006 22:09:03 +0300, ice <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Thought so...it might be an interesting way to layer a C++ compiler on top
>> of tcc.
Please, explain me - for why? I think no one will "invent bicycle" again :)
tcc++, if it will be created, wont be so fast as tcc.
Though if you want see C++ compiler without templates it will be quite simple,
indeed.
I think it will be much more useful if some useful (but simple!) extensions
will be implemented.
>> Of course, it would be extraordinarily difficult to make some of
>> C++'s features work in C.
>
>http://www.comeaucomputing.com/
>
- [Tinycc-devel] SEH in tcc, PerfectDark, 2006/05/20
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] SEH in tcc, Ben Hinkle, 2006/05/20
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] SEH in tcc, Jérôme VUARAND, 2006/05/21
- [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, PerfectDark, 2006/05/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, ice, 2006/05/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, Nigel Horne, 2006/05/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, ice, 2006/05/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, Dmytro Bogovych, 2006/05/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?,
PerfectDark <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, Axel Liljencrantz, 2006/05/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] C++ or C?, Dave Dodge, 2006/05/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] SEH in tcc, Ben Hinkle, 2006/05/24
Re: [Tinycc-devel] SEH in tcc, PerfectDark, 2006/05/22
Re: [Tinycc-devel] SEH in tcc, Fabrice Bellard, 2006/05/22