[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch
|
From: |
Thomas Preud'homme |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:39:33 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Le jeudi 31 janvier 2013 13:45:28, Domingo Alvarez Duarte a écrit :
>
> Maybe you didn't noticed that snprintf guarantee no buffer overflow while
> sprintf doesn't !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I didn't. Grischka just explained how no overflow can occured so sprintf is
fine.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, Vincent Lefevre, 2013/01/31
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, grischka, 2013/01/31
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, Vincent Lefevre, 2013/01/31
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, grischka, 2013/01/31
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, Vincent Lefevre, 2013/01/31
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, Michael Matz, 2013/01/31
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/31
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2013/01/31