Re: [Tinycc-devel] linking tinycc

[Christian Jullien]

Hi Daniel,

If I understand you well, you want to change RELICENSING file
From
Daniel Glöckner            ?                   arm-gen.c
To
Daniel Glöckner            NO                  arm-gen.c

On my side, I prefer a clear NO than a '?'

If I've really no objection about your choice (I respect). What can we do if
we want an ARM backend having BSD Like license?
- rewrite from scratch
- dual license (either LGPL or BSD Like). I know many projects having dual
license.
- you allow tcc projet to make a fork, arm-gen.c -> arm-bsd-gen.c (and maybe
./configure choose one or the other --bsd-only for example)

Do you see other possible solution, what do you advice?

Christian

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Daniel Glöckner
Sent: samedi 4 janvier 2014 10:27
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] linking tinycc

On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 10:08:09AM +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> I don't think law has determined whether copyright is per file or more 
> fined grained but it shouldn't make a big difference in the case of 
> tcc. Files are usually mainly contributed by 1 or 2 big contributors 
> and the rest are small patches that probably don't have copyright on their
own (IANAL though).

FWIW I'm fine with relicensing all my contributions to files other than
arm-gen.c to the BSD license reproduced in RELICENSING.

  Daniel


_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel