[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer
|
From: |
Gian Uberto Lauri |
|
Subject: |
Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:22:43 +0100 |
I have ti check, but I think I'll change the function used.
--
Gian Uberto
On 04.11.2015, at 20:17, Uday Reddy <address@hidden> wrote:
> There are two functions called `vm-save-buffer' and `vm-save-folder'.
>
> - `vm-save-folder' is the correct one to use. It does more.
> - But `vm-save-buffer' is bound to C-x C-s.
>
> Does anybody `vm-save-buffer' instead of `vm-save-folder'? For what purpose?
>
> There is a proposal to get rid of it (or at least the key binding).
>
> Cheers,
> Uday
>
- [VM] vm-save-buffer, Uday Reddy, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer,
Gian Uberto Lauri <=
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, John Stoffel, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, Johan Vromans, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Manuel Hermenegildo, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05