[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer)
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer) |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:00:03 +0100 |
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:41:21 -0500
Daniel Barrett <address@hidden> wrote:
> On November 5, 2015, Johan Vromans wrote:
> >...when a mail folder gets big (more than 2000 messages or so)
> >VM really slows down.
>
> Hmm, I have a 2500 message Amazon folder (mbox format) that opens in
> half a second. That might be because I have a fast 12-core CPU and an
> SSD,
On my 2-core 6GB CPU w/ SSD, the IMAP cache *loads* within a second, but
takes between 15 and 20 seconds to save.
-- Johan
- [VM] vm-save-buffer, Uday Reddy, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, John Stoffel, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, Johan Vromans, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Manuel Hermenegildo, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer),
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), John Stoffel, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Yeechang Lee, 2015/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), jl . k, 2015/11/06
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Hugo Geir, 2015/11/06
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Uday Reddy, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Yeechang Lee, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Uday Reddy, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05