[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer)
|
From: |
Johan Vromans |
|
Subject: |
Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:59:31 +0100 |
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:20:51 -0500
Daniel Barrett <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ah, we are comparing apples and oranges then. I'm not reading over
> IMAP. I'm reading and saving mbox files directly on local disk.
The IMAP cache file *is* an mbox file on local disk.
-- Johan
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, (continued)
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, John Stoffel, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] vm-save-buffer, Johan Vromans, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/04
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Manuel Hermenegildo, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Daniel Barrett, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer),
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), John Stoffel, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Yeechang Lee, 2015/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), jl . k, 2015/11/06
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Hugo Geir, 2015/11/06
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Uday Reddy, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Yeechang Lee, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Uday Reddy, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Johan Vromans, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), Uday Reddy, 2015/11/05
- Re: [VM] VM is awesome (was vm-save-buffer), John Stoffel, 2015/11/05