help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] criticism of the new syntax


From: Stephen Compall
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] criticism of the new syntax
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:06:59 -0600

On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 23:13 -0800, Derek Zhou wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2007 01:01:10 am Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Also, most languages (Java, Python, Ruby) are doing
> > whole-class-as-a-block, and the main objective of the new syntax was to
> > make the language reasonable to people familiar with those languages.
> I agree; but I still think we should not _enforce_ whole-class-as-a-block 
> like 
> java does. It would seriously limit the freedom in organizing source code.  

MyClass extend [
    "more methods!"
]

This is already in there.

> &c 

-- 
Our last-ditch plan is to change the forums into a podcast, then send
RSS feeds into the blogosphere so our users can further debate the
legality of mashups amongst this month's 20 'sexiest' gadgets.
        --Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]