[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] criticism of the new syntax
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] criticism of the new syntax |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:06:59 -0600 |
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 23:13 -0800, Derek Zhou wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2007 01:01:10 am Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Also, most languages (Java, Python, Ruby) are doing
> > whole-class-as-a-block, and the main objective of the new syntax was to
> > make the language reasonable to people familiar with those languages.
> I agree; but I still think we should not _enforce_ whole-class-as-a-block
> like
> java does. It would seriously limit the freedom in organizing source code.
MyClass extend [
"more methods!"
]
This is already in there.
> &c
--
Our last-ditch plan is to change the forums into a podcast, then send
RSS feeds into the blogosphere so our users can further debate the
legality of mashups amongst this month's 20 'sexiest' gadgets.
--Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part