[Help-smalltalk] gst-remote architecture

[Stefan Schmiedl]

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:11:23 +0200
Joachim Jaeckel <address@hidden> wrote:

> > A bug in gst-remote? ;-)
> 
> Oh... *sad* I was sooooo happy, that gst-remote was running on my 
> computer after your described patch for amd64.

I can make a ruby script remote-able by including the
drb-library and starting the server. Is it possible for
gst to take the same approach, i.e. _just_ file in some 
Smalltalk code?

Why do we need a dedicated gst-remote binary?

Curious,
s.