Re: postscript printers for lilypond

[David Kastrup]

address@hidden writes:

> Karl:
>> David:
> ...
>> >  I just
>> > recently removed a Ghostscriptism (using max/mix operators) that would
>> > have made regular PostScript interpreters barf.  Maybe that's fixed in
>> > master now?
>
> Yes, I see it.
>
>> I'll try that, though there where some problems with the guile version 
>> and some fonts last time I compiled lilypond.
>
> Ok, compiled new lilypond, only problem vas guile and texi2html 
> versions and I had to rebuild extractpdfmark also for make doc to work.
>
> Still, the printer reports error.

Sorry for the wasted effort: I think it was worth a try.

-- 
David Kastrup