[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: DOS, DOS and Windows
From: |
Doug Lawson |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: DOS, DOS and Windows |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Oct 1996 10:12:13 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Wayne Buttles wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Doug Lawson wrote:
> >
> > > One thing I missed about compiling Lynx code (actually most Un*x code)
> > > with Borland C 3.1 (not sure about other versions) is 0 != NULL.
> >
> > It's been a while since I used Borland 3.anything but I don't remember
> > having that problem...............
>
> Umm, maybe it is a case of me not quite understanding the real problem.
> Here is a sample from HTTP.c (in HTML_FORM):
>
> source = HTAnchor_findChildAndLink(me->node_anchor, 0, action, 0);
>
> Needed to be:
>
> source = HTAnchor_findChildAndLink(me->node_anchor, NULL, action, NULL);
Well, that would indicate that the compiler is not compliant. Obviously
NULL is #defined to something other than 0. Like I said, it's been some
time since I used BC3.x .
Doug
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Wayne Buttles, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Hiram Lester, Jr., 1996/10/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Wayne Buttles, 1996/10/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Hiram Lester, Jr., 1996/10/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Christopher R. Maden, 1996/10/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Hiram Lester, Jr., 1996/10/25
Re: LYNX-DEV DOS, DOS and Windows, Egor Egorov, 1996/10/26