[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?)
From: |
Walter Skorski |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?) |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Nov 1996 14:24:46 -0500 (EST) |
Filip M Gieszczykiewicz writes:
> > How's about for SINGLE_LINE_BOOKMARK_ADD mode (currently known as
> > "Advanced" mode), we have the bookmarks file parsed into one of those
> > circular buffers used by the line editor? [...]
>
> The problem here is that it's right on the border of my C "abilities".
> I hate to say it but: feel free :-)
Well, if it's on the border of yours, it's probably way beyond mine...
But, if I get time to poke around the code, I will.
> I figure that work can continue on
> "The" way of doing it - which Fote will eventally approve (hopefully) -
As Fote has been trying to pound into our collective skull for the
past few months, he's not in a position to approve or disapprove of
anything. He took on that role more or less by default, and now chose
to deliberately distance himself from the role - because he's tired of
it, and probably also because by doing so he's broadened the level of
participation in development. I mean, the level of activity and
number of active participants have doubled, easily, since he started
his "vacation" - and that's a very good thing!
Just don't look to him as the one to sanction your mods for the next
official distribution. In fact, don't expect anyone to do that for a
while yet; Rob Partington got anointed to next take on that role (by
default, again, much the way Foteos did), and he's still in the
process of getting acclimated to it.
> and I'll just keep on peddling my patches.
More power to you. You keep on peddling; that's the way progress
happens here - each person building on the next guy's ideas. I'm only
sorry that my contributions have come exclusively in the form of
suggestions, rather than actual code.
> Besides, it only took me a
> few days to memmorize the frequent bookmarks - I almost never look at
> the list... unless I want to put it in some category I can't remember.
Well, with a single level of classification, that's easy, but it'd get
more difficult with each level added.
> I figure that for my uses, what is there is just right. Let me re-
> state my objective: to be able to sort the bookmarks into more than a
> dozen categories AT THE TIME when I'm saving them.
A worthy objective. I currently have about a hundred things in my
bookmark file - work related, personal, and in between - that I
haven't yet moved to the file I keep for classifying them.
Eliminating that step would be a boon to me as well, but the file I
keep is organized as nested <ul>s, sometimes three or four levels
deep, and it struck me that if I found that sort of heirarchcal
structure useful, others would, too.
> A few 400KB
> bookmark files made me realize this REAL QUICK :-|
Wait a minute, let me ask you - how can one accumulate that many
bookmarks *at 1200 baud*? You must be browsing 'round the clock! ;-)
--
. iksrokS retlaW<>Walter Skorski .. address@hidden .
Computer Administrator, Div. of Medical Genetics, Thomas Jefferson University
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, (continued)
- LYNX-DEV trickle-down development?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Walter Skorski, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?),
Walter Skorski <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Steve Holmes, 1996/11/11
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/11
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Multibookmark patch, Bela Lubkin, 1996/11/03
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Multibookmark patch, Bela Lubkin, 1996/11/04