Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process)

[T.E.Dickey]

> > >   I'd consider merging to wwwlib5 as the highest priority.  It's
> > > the biggest job on the list, I think, and will require major
> > > restructuring of the Lynx code.  (For starters, can't we make all the
> > > C code ANSI now, and forget about K&R C?)  Therefore, I think we
> > 
> > A hearty second to that motion!
> 
> How about just not requiring that *new* code uses those conventions /
> macros?
agreed (getting rid of the macros also introduces the possibility of
errors).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;