Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2pre.7

[dickey]

> 
> At the very least, html supplied in the lynx distribution really needs to 
> validate to an included publically accessible DOCTYPE.  Lynx html should also 
> use only the HTML that one would get regardless of the configuration (not 
> that the pages in questions violate this - just thinking out loud at some 
> of the standards for lynx html that we should write somewhere in the 
> distribution). 
>  
> Lynx's lynx.cfg information page seems sufficient to me. 

same here.  (none of my concerns about lynxcfg have been addressed, though
I'm willing to adjust the configure script to make it simpler for Vlad to
make it an add-on)

> Larry W. Virden                 <URL: mailto:address@hidden> 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey