[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4? |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:26:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:10:30PM +0100, RobertM wrote:
> Mea Culpa,
no - c'est moi...
> However when lynx is being used by a specific anonymous user you can
> edit many of these things by:
>
> KEYMAP:!:DO_NOTHING # Spawn default shell
> KEYMAP:d:DO_NOTHING # Download current link
true. I haven't seen much response for a while regarding this type of
configuration (but did get some inquiries recently).
> > >>3) I can save options to a .lynxrc file
>
> I think I fixed this by both making the file non writable, as well as
> editing LYOptions.c to not even give the anonymous user the option.
it would be nice to make it automatic. I see this is a change between
2.8.3 and 2.8.4 which was overlooked.
> > For #1 I have CAN_ANONYMOUS_GOTO_FILE set to FALSE but it appears that
> > -anonymous causes the file_url restriction to be turned off thus
> > allowing the file: to work.
>
> Hmm, you're right it is allowed when going by a link. This is most
> bad.
2.8.3 allows me to do this, too.
> > For #3 I cannot find any lynxrc/options settings that apply when
> > -anonymous is used in userdefs.h/lynx.cfg.
> >
> > Same for #4. None of the lynx.cfg/userdefs.h settings seem to apply to
> > downloading to disk when -anonymous is used.
> >
> > My userdefs.h and lynx.cfg are virtually identical between 2.8.3 and
> > 2.8.4 which is why I'm a bit confused.
>
> Many apologies, you do seem to be correct on all counts.
but is the behavior different between 2.8.3 and 2.8.4? A quick check of
the 2.8.3 in my /usr/bin seems to behave the same way (aside from allowing
a save of the .lynxrc file).
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Jeff Long, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Jeff Long, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?,
Thomas Dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Bela Lubkin, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, RobertM, 2002/09/06
- Re: lynx-dev -anonymous broken in 2.8.4?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/09/06