[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:59:49 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ethan Blanton <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> This is precisely why Yury is correct. Because, on many systems, \r
> and \n have _different meanings_, they should be properly and
> reversibly preserved even in text files.
I can believe that's true of some text files. But for (to take a
random example) C++ source files, it's surely not true, is it?
I'd expect to get C++ source files with native line endings, and to be
able to commit them with native line endings, and I'd be surprised if
I had to do something special to avoid ending up with CRLF endings on
Unix, or LF endings on Windows.
So how can we have both, while keeping the solution sufficiently
comprehensible that people can work out how to get it to work for
them?
[...]
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Yury Polyanskiy, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Yury Polyanskiy, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Yury Polyanskiy, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Ethan Blanton, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/30
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Yury Polyanskiy, 2006/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Matthew Hannigan, 2006/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Yury Polyanskiy, 2006/01/31
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Bruce Stephens, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Larry Hastings, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Jon Bright, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/30
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Bruce Stephens, 2006/01/30