Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions

[Matthew Hannigan]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:50:51AM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> Again: solution is trivial. "Transform what I ask you to (LF->CRLF and
> back) and don't mess with anything special (like CR->CRLF etc)."

The other nice thing about this is that it's perfectly
reversible, even for 'binary' files.

On a slightly different note, perhaps it would be best
for monotone to store the literal version and only transform
for the purposes of diffing or checksumming/sigs.

At least the fidelity would be there.
I imagine this would have major implications for other parts
of monotone though.

Matt