[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC)
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:37:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alex Queiroz" <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> What I've done here at work is to write all the unit test functions
> as Lua CFunctions, export then to Lua and run the unit tests from a
> Lua script that also generates a report. Very handy.
Sounds to me like the costs would outweigh the benefits for doing
that. But I guess I don't know the details of what you're doing.
I don't see much of a benefit for doing that for monotone, anyway.
- [Monotone-devel] Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/06
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC),
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/25