Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really

[hendrik]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:40:56AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:25 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > I dunno what the solution is.  Maybe have stdio work with non-automate
> > commands as well, and having all commands be able to output stdio-
> > specific data that would be more oriented for scripts, as well as
> > human readable output, all depending on how the command was called.
> 
> ...maybe (eventually) move the non-automate variants to a separate
> executable (mtn) that calls monotone (which now only does automate) and
> reformats the output for human consumption?

Thereby ensuring that the automate interface actually does provided all the 
information the human interface does.

-- hendrik