[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: whitelisting recipients
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: whitelisting recipients |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 11:57:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
In the last episode (Jun 03), Derek J. Balling said:
> On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> >I add "whitelist_to address@hidden" lines to spamassassin's local.cf for
> >people like this.
>
> Does this work when you get something like:
>
> From: <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
>
> and <address@hidden> is a member of address@hidden
Depends on the rest of the headers in that message. According to the
faq at http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=all#4.11 ,
spamassassin cannot directly access the envelope headers (even through
our milter can see them). It does look at the following message
headers that intermediate MTAs sometimes generate:
Resent-To # std, rfc822
Resent-Cc # std, rfc822
To
Apparently-To # sendmail, from envelope
Delivered-To # Postfix, I think
Envelope-Recipients # qmail: new-inject(1)
Apparently-Resent-To # procmailrc manpage
X-Envelope-To # procmailrc manpage
Cc
It actually wouldn't be that hard to have spamass-milter create
Resent-To and Resent-From headers before passing the message to spamc.
The modification would not affect the original message, so there would
be no security issues (BCCs becoming visible, etc).
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden
- whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients,
Dan Nelson <=
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/03
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Derek J. Balling, 2003/06/04
- Re: whitelisting recipients, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04