[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR |
Date: |
07 May 2002 23:13:00 +0900 |
"Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:
> I find DESTDIR preferable as it is safer and more reliable.
Note that I have nothing against DESTDIR -- in fact I like it, and I
think patches to add support for it are a good thing.
However, as things stand, one can't rely on it being implemented, and so
must be prepared to do use prefix if necessary.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Nick Clifton, 2002/05/05
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Federico G. Schwindt, 2002/05/06
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/06
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Paul D. Smith, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Paul D. Smith, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/08
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/08
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/08
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/05/07
Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Nick Clifton, 2002/05/07