[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR |
Date: |
09 May 2002 02:33:21 +0900 |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> Another little secret like this in the standards is the
> `install-strip' argument. That was Richard's response to a suggestion
> from François. Unfortunately Richard ignored existing practice and
> instead added a new target which turned out to be surprisingly hard to
> implement correctly.
What's `existing practice'?
-Miles
--
Run away! Run away!
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, (continued)
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Paul D. Smith, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Paul D. Smith, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/08
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Tom Tromey, 2002/05/08
- Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/05/07
Re: PATCH: honour DESTDIR, Nick Clifton, 2002/05/07