[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:38:35 +0100 |
>From address@hidden
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:59 AM
> To: bug-gnubg
> Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
>
> I tried 100 5pt 0ply matches woolsey.xml agains snowie.xml.
> Analysing
> with woolsey at 0ply a rating discrepancy of 2193 +-8
> resulted (as
> estimated by the "error rate"). Again totally negligible.
>
That was quick. Very interesting information. If anything was going to
show up, I'd expect it in Woolsey vs Snowie. I need to rethink how much
accuracy one needs when determining a MET.
--
Ian
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, (continued)
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs,
Ian Shaw <=
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen, 2003/09/12