[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:20:48 +0200 (CEST) |
> Can you extract from your data the records when the scores got into 3, 5
> or 7-point match range?
No.
> It might be useful to do a test of 5-point matches of Woolsey vs.
> Snowie, which are probably the most commonly used METs. Or find the two
> which diverge the most and compare those, just to see if there is any
> noticeable difference.
OK, I'll try a batch of 3pt and 5pt matches. Can anyone advize me on which
pair of METS that come with GNUBG diverge the most?
Kees
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/03
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nis Jorgensen, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/04
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs,
kvandoel <=
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/12
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/12
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen, 2003/09/12