[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:11:38 +0100 |
address@hidden wrote on Monday, September 08, 2003 9:40 AM
> Now that the external player bugs are dead I tried playing
> some 17pt
> matches expert-expert using different met's.
>
> I think the results show that the differences between
> the mets are
> completely negligible in terms of equivalent rating strength points.
>
This is very interesting to me, since I've been doing rollouts with a
view to establishing a MET for gnubg at 2-ply play. It takes a long
time, so if I'm wasting my CPU cycles I'd like to know!
I would expect METs to make most difference in shorter matches, over 3,
5 or possibly 7 points. At higher scores I would expect most METs to be
very similar. I would guess a lot of your 17 point matches didn't come
down to the 5-point match stage, so any effect at these scores will have
been diluted.
Can you extract from your data the records when the scores got into 3, 5
or 7-point match range?
It might be useful to do a test of 5-point matches of Woolsey vs.
Snowie, which are probably the most commonly used METs. Or find the two
which diverge the most and compare those, just to see if there is any
noticeable difference.
--
ian
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, nis, 2003/09/02
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/03
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nis Jorgensen, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/04
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs,
Ian Shaw <=
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/12
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/12
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen, 2003/09/12