[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 02:51:27 +0200 (CEST) |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:40:28, someone who doesn't want to be mentioned
in the same breath as me wrote:
>> pointed out that the Woolsey table at 4-away 3-away looked completely
>> wrong compared to the Snowie table for example. Many othger scores may
>> be quite correct so testing all the scores may dilute the differences
>> one would feel. How about trying a series of match games where the score
>> is specifically 4-away 3-away and see how big a difference it makes?
>The mwc at a match score is never used at that match score, or
>shouldn't be. (This is a problem with some work of Ortega and
>Kleinman. I don't know whether they correct this in their book on cubes
>in match play.) The entry at 3-away 4-away should affect cube decisions
>at 4-away 4-away greatly, as well as 4-away 5-away and 3-away 5-away.
100 4pt matches between woolsey.xml and snowie.xml at 0ply resulted in a
rating difference of 2 +- 1 points. The maximum playing difference in a
match (error rates converted to rating points) was 49.
Kees
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, (continued)
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/12
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen, 2003/09/12