RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs

[Douglas Zare]

Quoting Albert Silver <address@hidden>:

> Zare
> pointed out that the Woolsey table at 4-away 3-away looked completely
> wrong compared to the Snowie table for example. Many othger scores may
> be quite correct so testing all the scores may dilute the differences
> one would feel. How about trying a series of match games where the score
> is specifically 4-away 3-away and see how big a difference it makes?

The mwc at a match score is never used at that match score, or shouldn't be.
(This is a problem with some work of Ortega and Kleinman. I don't know whether
they correct this in their book on cubes in match play.) The entry at 3-away
4-away should affect cube decisions at 4-away 4-away greatly, as well as 4-away
5-away and 3-away 5-away.

Douglas Zare