[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Demexp-dev] And now, what for demexp--dev--0.7?
From: |
David MENTRE |
Subject: |
Re: [Demexp-dev] And now, what for demexp--dev--0.7? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:38:54 +0200 |
Hi FĂ©lix,
2005/8/10, Felix HENRY <address@hidden>:
> If I understand correctly, this means a solution where a web client "talks"
> to a web server and then the web server access the demexp server, but the
> demexp server does not see the difference between this type of access and
> a regular binary client? I have no objection but I just want to confirm I
> understood it.
Yes exactly. This architecture forces me to keep the current RPC
protocol, that would be available to develop a secure voting protocol
(as underlined by John), for scripting facilities (as with Thomas's
Python scripts) and, when a legion of coders will improve the 1.0
client and server, to develop a better user interface. :-)
> Given your arguments and the other ones discussed on the mailing list
> I certainly support the development of a web interface.
Great!
Yours,
d.
- Re: [Demexp-dev] And now, what for demexp--dev--0.7?, (continued)
Re: [Demexp-dev] And now, what for demexp--dev--0.7?, David MENTRE, 2005/08/09
Re: [Demexp-dev] And now, what for demexp--dev--0.7?, skaller, 2005/08/09
Re: [Demexp-dev] And now, what for demexp--dev--0.7?, Felix HENRY, 2005/08/10