Re: [DotGNU]XNS and Savannah?

[David Sugar]

I think you are correct about investigating XNS.  If you like I will talk to 
them.  Hmm...seems I sleep when back from France and everything happens!  Does 
that mean I am sleeping on the job? :)  Okay, over the course of the day I am 
going to try to get cought up with everything and will offer some suggestions. 
 I have added amil and you to the Savannah DotGNU project because I didn't 
know anyone else's savannah id's yet.

I think we need to initially create an "admin" mailing list for the major 
maintainers, a seperate general mailing list (or just use/move this one), and 
a package proposal mailing list on Savannah.  If you would like to do this, 
and have any other ideas for initial mailing lists to organize things, feel 
free to do this.  I have listed you as a DotGNU project "admin"...

David

Myrddian wrote:

> > It may be a good idea to attempt contacting XNSORG, but as far
> > as I can tell, the XNS project appears to be dead or dormant.
> > http://www.xns.org/developer/source/ has not been updated in
> > over half a year.  The XNS Technical Specification are still "to
> > be produced".  There are still not even any developer mailing
> > lists.
>
>
>
> Well this would not be a replacement to our authorization method, but adding 
> support for
> XNS, makes it possible to have a larger audience, since XNS is something we 
> could connect to
> as in they use multiple "authorized" authorization servers. 
>
>
> Contact yes, David you might want to do this? Or Should I? 
>
>  
>
> __________________________________________
> Myrddian <address@hidden(nospam)au>
> -------------------------------------------
> "I stayed up all night playing poker with tarot cards. I got a full house
>  and four people died". 
>
>                    -- Steven Wright 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers