Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home...

[Barry Fitzgerald]

David Sugar wrote:
> 
> I suspect one reason they choose to come up with that horrible "shared source"
> license was because they had code that could not be hidden in a true binary
> (CLR stuff) and so found it nessisary to have some license to cover "visible
> code" and later convenient to use it as a marketing tool.  The effect of this
> system and .net software in easily decodable binaries could be very corrosive.
> 

I know that we don't want the legal battle, but do you think that we can
even avoid one?

        -Barry