[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono
From: |
Kent Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:12:15 +0000 |
Oh I forgot ...
> > Politically, CIL/CRL has been submitted to ECMA for standardization,
> > while Sun on the contrary is sitting tight on the Java specs. Of
> > course, MS has a track record of embracing and extending things. They
> > can do this with CIL/CRL as well; this is most likely the greatest
> > danger with it (aside from Passport, which as I understand it doesn't
> > really need a virtual machine to work).
>
> Ok this is a plus. Sun is collecting money for EJB use.
As well as suing Microsoft for heaps of money .. heh heh :)
--kent
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, tali streit, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Soeren Sandmann, 2001/07/16
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Myrddian, 2001/07/16
Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/16
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/17