[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 03:05:30 -0400 |
Kent Nguyen wrote:
>
> >
> > Even if 63% of all of the web servers out there are apache, these
> > servers - using .Net compatible services - could further leverage
> > Microsoft's position on the desktop by running Microsoft centric
> > architectures over Free Software. This it why dotGnu is the real danger
> > to Microsoft. Mono is a necessary component to some extent.
>
> What about Microsoft passport customer based? Doesn't that attract software
> developer to buy a specialize "security pack" to interoperate with passport?
>
> --kent
Well, I think it's obvious that user marketshare is always an issue when
considering what platform some developers will develop for - as does an
already existing userbase. These are essentially one and the same.
However, I fail to see your point here. Yes, their marketshare is a
factor. So...???
-Barry
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Myrddian, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, tali streit, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono,
Barry Fitzgerald <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Soeren Sandmann, 2001/07/16
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Myrddian, 2001/07/16
Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/16