[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:01:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> We may be revisiting the design choice made in Bug #21475 and Patch
> #6300. In particular, the reported problem can be a side-effect of this
> chunk:
[snip]
> - userinfo = netloc.rsplit("@", 1)[0]
> + userinfo = netloc.split("@", 1)[0]
Interesting. I remembered there was some history with urlparse but wasn't sure
what.
I was under the impression that it now worked for Thorsten, when not using
SSL, indicating that the @ handling did not cause problems in his case. But
as you note, and I missed, his latest example does have a @ in the username.
The other problem was that my initial patch was entirely broken, because I did
not look into the return value of urlparse() properly.
What I still don't get for the life of me, is why it is behaving as if 'https'
was an unknown scheme...
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, (continued)
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/08
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Darik Horn, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing,
Peter Schuller <=
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/09
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/14
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/15