Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Announcing Déjà Dup

[Jacob]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:52:08 -0400
"Michael Terry" <address@hidden> wrote:

> The current infrastructure doesn't provide for that, because you can't
> predict the eventual tarred size?  Does duplicity scan all the files
> it intends to backup before it starts?  If it did, it could provide
> progress information in terms of the amount of on-disk (vs on-backend)
> bits it has handled so far versus the total.  At least, for full
> backups.  I don't know enough about how incremental backups are done.

This would be solved by the --dry-run option suggested a while back.

-- 
    Jacob

    "For then there will be great distress, unequaled
    from the beginning of the world until now—and never
    to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut
    short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the
    elect those days will be shortened."
    
    Are you ready?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature