Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff

[Stefan Monnier]

> I understand, but I was curious why these 12 files do use the
> variable, while all the rest don't.  IOW, what is (or was) so special
> about these files?

I'm to blame for the pcvs-util.el, I think, but I must say I can't
remember nor figure out why I did that.

For the others, I believe the expectation is that it's common to use only
a small part of those files (like a handful of functions from CL or one
particular command from dired-aux), which is the most favorable
situation for byte-compile-dynamic.


        Stefan