[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: solarized
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: solarized |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:05:51 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I agree. It is practically impossible to design for accessibility using
> colours that are equally accessible on light and dark backgrounds, while
> also remaining fairly distinct between themselves. The background has
> to be a given, so that all foreground values can be selected
> accordingly.
I think you are right. But this suggests an idea to me. Would it
make sense to design a color palette, in the same systematic way as
Solarized, but with only dark backgrounds, and the other colors meant
to contrast with those?
And then invert it for light backgrounds?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Theme generator, (continued)
- Re: Theme generator (was: solarized), Tim Cross, 2020/09/15
- Re: Theme generator (was: solarized), chad, 2020/09/16
- Re: Theme generator, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: Theme generator (was: solarized), Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/09/15
- Re: solarized, Praharsh Suryadevara, 2020/09/15
- Re: solarized,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: solarized, Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2020/09/17
- RE: solarized, Drew Adams, 2020/09/17
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- RE: solarized, Drew Adams, 2020/09/18
- Re: solarized, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: solarized, Tim Cross, 2020/09/17