Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> I've attached a quick proof-of-concept of moving the kbd implementation
> to subr.el.  With this, all the tests I have assembled so far pass and
> this bootstraps.  It was mostly just a case of ripping out the calls to
> cl-lib functions.

I haven't tried it, but it looks good to me.

> If this is something we want to do, I can finish this patch up.  To
> begin with, I'd want to look it all over for correctness and add more
> tests (ideas welcome).

Could perhaps add some tests to see that it lets "\C-c\C-c" etc through
unscathed... 

> I guess it would also make sense to just change
> `read-kbd-macro' to call kbd, instead of the other way around.

Yup.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no