Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[Stefan Kangas]

Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:

> Is your 'new-kbd' intended to be bug-for-bug compatible with 'kbd', or
> have there been any functional changes along the way?  Are you
> suggesting that we could perhaps just replace 'kbd' with your new
> version?  (One observation is that your version still uses the cl-
> functions, so it would need adjusting for subr.el.)

Now I note the following comments:

;;; Tests:
;;; Note that we fail on
;;; "M-ESC"
;;; "M-<DEL>"
;;; "H-<RET>" etc,
;;; But match on "H-RET"
;;; (thanks Drew Adams) Likely due to over-optimization.

So I guess we could borrow ideas from your code but not use it as a
drop-in replacement in its current form.