Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[T.V Raman]

See the associated set of tests -- I intended it to be completely
compatible, but from memory someone on the emacs-devel list pointed
out one diff --
it was an extreme corner case that I didn't fix.

I use ems-kbd in emacspeak instead of  'kbd because it avoids pulling
in all of the keyboard macro code and speeds up startup a bit

Stefan Kangas writes:
 > T.V Raman <raman@google.com> writes:
 > 
 > > Related: see
 > > https://emacspeak.blogspot.com/2020/10/extracted-light-weight-key-reader-by.html
 > > and some follow-up discussion probably on this list.
 > 
 > Thanks, that's useful.  I will most likely "borrow" some ideas from
 > your tests for the test suite.  There seems to be some opportunities
 > for simplifying the code as well, something that I avoided in my
 > version.
 > 
 > Is your 'new-kbd' intended to be bug-for-bug compatible with 'kbd', or
 > have there been any functional changes along the way?  Are you
 > suggesting that we could perhaps just replace 'kbd' with your new
 > version?  (One observation is that your version still uses the cl-
 > functions, so it would need adjusting for subr.el.)

-- 

Thanks,

--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮

--

Thanks,

--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮

--

Thanks,

--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮