[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:15:13 -0800 |
> 1-what does unchecked means ?
The owl code is not run on all dragons, because when a dragon
has lots of escape room the results are meaningless. The exact
criterion is around line 320 of dragon.c:
/* Some dragons can be ignored but be extra careful with big dragons. */
if (crude_dragon_weakness(ALIVE, &no_eyes, 0,
DRAGON2(str).moyo_territorial_value,
DRAGON2(str).escape_route - 10)
< 0.00001 + gg_max(0.12, 0.32 - 0.01*dragon[str].effective_size)) {
DRAGON2(str).owl_status = UNCHECKED;
DRAGON2(str).owl_attack_point = NO_MOVE;
DRAGON2(str).owl_defense_point = NO_MOVE;
}
If the owl code is not run, then the matcher status is the
crude status and the owl status is ``unchecked''.
> 2-after -T (moves 174) the upper right white dragon is red colored
> (critical) .
> does this evaluation concern the dragon status *before* or *after*
> the move has been evaluated ? (GG3.4 shows the dragon as green )
The critical status means that GNU Go believes (correctly)
that the dragon can be killed or defended depending on who
moves first. Unfortunately O13 is believed to be a defense
for both O18 and N15 (which are two separate dragons). Of
course O11 is the only move.
> 3- using rxvt under cygwin i can't have any color while i have them
> in the MS-DOS Shell window (but the dragon_status display is not visible
> because the window has just 50 lines)
> maybe,someone has a solution for the rxvt problem .
Maybe rxvt was compiled without color support. Do you have
any other terminals such as xterm, nxterm, color-xterm etc.?
Any of these terminals can be compiled with color either
enabled or not.
Dan
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/01/14
- Message not available
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/01/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2004/01/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, SP Lee, 2004/01/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Inge Wallin, 2004/01/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, sp lee, 2004/01/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2004/01/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, SP lee, 2004/01/20
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/01/20
- [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game, max-d, 2004/01/20
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game, Jens Yllman, 2004/01/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game, Dave Denholm, 2004/01/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a GG3.53 very bad game, Jens Yllman, 2004/01/27
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2004/01/20
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/01/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, bump, 2004/01/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] another semeai patch, bump, 2004/01/14