[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments -- Copyright policy

From: Davi Leal
Subject: Re: Comments -- Copyright policy
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:03:24 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

a) as the FSF does:

   @copyright  2007  GNU Herds Free Software Association

b) as the Linux kernel does:

   @copyright  2007  Klaus Weiss <klaus dot weiss at nanet dot at>
               2007  Name Here   <name dot here at __ dot __>


  License:           GPL v3, when be ready

  Copyright policy:  (a), (b), or any other?

I think the (a) licensing model requires signing paper.  There is not formal 
Association, at least yet. Anyway (a) gets complex.

I propose go with the (b) model and so cut down the work needed to maintain 
the association operation.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]