|
From: | Brendan Scott |
Subject: | Re: [Gnumed-devel] Move to Qt |
Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:18:46 +1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 |
Sorry for not responding for a while - a succession of minor crises. David Guest wrote: > Thank God you're here. We can dispense with all that IANAL prefacing and > ask you for the right answer. :-) You will find the following preface to my responses: IAALBTINLA :) [snip] I follow everything up to this bit:
Thus, as I see it, a Qt-based version of GNUmed for Windows would need to be licensed under a non-GPL license to allow its use with these non-GPLed versions of the Qt runtime libraries and the commercial version of PyQT. That's not a fundamental problem, because the GPL
I don't understand why a non GPL licence is necessary? Is this because of the manner in which linkage occurs at compile time?
Brendan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |