|
From: | Ian Haywood |
Subject: | Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed/client/etc/config-definitions/DBDefault.definitions vs. gnumed/sql/gmConfigData.sql |
Date: | Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:11:01 +1100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041012) |
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
There seem to be two competing ways of defining config options.Nope. If I understand things correctly (Hilmar is the final authority) the *definitions* stuff is only used to define types and perhaps ranges for config parameters such that advanced config parsers/UIs can support context checking of user input without knowing anything about particular options. If you just want to add some new option values go usesql/gmConfigData.sql and be done with it.
But gmConfigData.sql lets you specify type and help string too, DBDefault.definitions seems to have no purpose, even for ConfigRegistry. Ian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |