Re: [Gnumed-devel] emrjounalplugin.py comments further html work

[J Busser]

At 10:50 AM +1000 9/19/05, Horst Herb wrote:
> Don't think of it as a diagnosis then, think of it as a problem list.
> How else would you be able to quickly browse a patient's history if encounters
> weren't labelled with something meaningful?
>
> Even if you have ten encounters labelled as "vague unspecific symptoms" it is
> most helpful, because then really alarm bells should ring - whereas 10
> unlabelled episodes are far less likely to draw your attention

Horst, in your mini-gnumed is each of your visit SOAP notes a single 
row in a clinical notes table?

And how are your many-to-one relationships between multiple problems, 
and a particular progress note, stored in the mini-gnumed backend?  I 
don't believe GNUmed proper, as its schema is currently defined, 
would support that (?)

Karsten, are these approaches (current GNUmed vs Horst's in which a 
single note record can be linked to multiple problems) incompatible 
in the same schema?